assignmentcafe.com –
The International Coach Federation provides us with 11 core competencies and 28 ethical
standards.
INSTRUCTIONS
Choose 4 of the core competencies and 5 of the ethical standards. Evaluate them, research them,
and write about them from a perspective of how they should be implemented or could be
violated. Interpret them from your perspective. Be sure to support any opinions or suggestions
with the textbook or solid research. Examples and scenarios are highly encouraged.
This assignment should be 4
No abstract required. Subheadings required. Please see the Comprehensive &
Ethics Case Study grading rubric for the complete details of how this assignment will be graded.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComponents
|
10 to >9.0 pts Advanced All major components of the question(s) posed are answered. |
9 to >8.0 pts Proficient Some major components of the question(s) posed are answered. |
8 to >0.0 pts Developing Limited major components of the question(s) posed are answered. |
0 pts Not Present |
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport
|
60 to >55.0 pts Advanced Major points are mastered and supported by the following: The response contains a thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting) of question(s) posed in the case study; Appropriate rationale is given as a solution or recommendation; The rationale is supported by appropriate resources (not just that the resources are used, but that they are used effectively); and points are substantiated with little to no opinions being unsupported. Examples are provided, as appropriate. |
55 to >51.0 pts Proficient Major points meet the standard as follows: The response contains analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting) of question(s) posed in the case study; Some rationale is given as a solution or recommendation; The rationale is supported by some resources (not just that the resources are used, but that they are used effectively); and points are substantiated but there is some opinion being unsupported. Limited examples. |
51 to >0.0 pts Developing Major points lack the standard required for this subject area: The response contains limited analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting) of question(s) posed in the case study; Limited rationale is given as a solution or recommendation; The rationale is rarely supported by resources (not just that the resources are used, but that they are used effectively); points and opinions are unsubstantiated. No examples. |
0 pts Not Present |
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations
|
10 to >9.0 pts Advanced Required reading materials are used and met (at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles, 1 of the course textbooks, and the Bible). |
9 to >8.0 pts Proficient Required reading materials are not quite met (at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles, 1 of the course textbooks, and the Bible). |
8 to >0.0 pts Developing Required reading materials are lacking (at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles, 1 of the course textbooks, and the Bible). |
0 pts Not Present |
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWord-Count
|
10 to >9.0 pts Advanced 800-1200 word-count meets requirement for the applicable case study. |
9 to >8.0 pts Proficient 400-799 word-count does not quite meet the requirement for the applicable case study. |
8 to >0.0 pts Developing 399 or below does not meet the word-count for this case study. |
0 pts Not Present |
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling/Grammar
|
10 to >9.0 pts Advanced Student masters proper spelling, grammar, and current APA format. |
9 to >8.0 pts Proficient Student meets the standard for proper spelling, grammar, and current APA format. |
8 to >0.0 pts Developing Student lacks in proper spelling, grammar, and current APA format. |
0 pts Not Present |
