– Study Design, Design Validity, Analysis and Results/2022 –

T​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‍‍​he analysis for this assignment will focus on the design and its validity in addition to the analysis and presentation of the results. Think critically about the use of hypothesis testing in the behavioral sciences. Implement logic and mathematical basis for different inferential statistics. Using the previously selected three articles write a paper that address key areas listed below. 

 Study and Design-Are sufficient details provided in the procedure? Is the procedure written clearly? Does the procedure flow logically? 

Are all steps of the procedure clearly stated?


 Were there any ethical considerations relative to the design?

 Was there sufficient protection of human subjects?

 The design and procedures for data collection are clearly described in detail that they could be replicated. 2] Controls- Were controls to ensure internal validity identified?

 Were the controls adequate? The study report does fully identify and describe controls for maintaining validity. The controls seem adequate to elucidate the intervention’s impact on the identified outcomes.

  Analysis-Is the data analysis section well organized?


 Is the statistical method used for analysis appropriate for the research question(s) and/or hypothesis and level of measurement? The study report describes the analytic procedures to generate the results. The rationale is provided, and the description is complete. 

 Results-Are tables and graphs clearly labeled?


 Do the tables and graphs complement the text? The results are conveyed in a clear comprehensible manner​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‌‍‍​. The presentation includes tables or other devices to assist in clearly presenting findings of the study. Are tables and graphs clearly labeled?

 Do the tables and graphs complement the text?


  Discussion-The discussion of the results includes a discussion of limitations and implications for practice and further research. 

The discussion is thorough and comprehensible

. Does the discussion clearly flow from the data? 

Does the discussion place the study’s findings in context with what is already known?

 If a theoretical or conceptual framework is presented, are the nature of the findings discussed in the context of the framework?