Which website do you find has the best way to review information for accuracy?
Thereliability of Wikipediaconcerns the validity, verifiability, andofand its user-generated, particularly its. It is written and edited bywho generate online content with the editorial oversight of other volunteer editors via community-generated policies and guidelines. Wikipedia carries the general disclaimer that it can be “” and maintains an inclusion threshold of “.” This editing model is highly concentrated, as 77% of all articles are written by, a majority of whom.The reliability of the project has been tested statistically, through comparative review, analysis of the historical patterns, and strengths and weaknesses inherent in its editing process.The online encyclopedia has been, principally regarding its content, presentation, and. Studies and surveys attempting to gauge the reliability of Wikipedia, with findings varied and inconsistent.
Select assessments of its reliability have examined how quickly vandalism content perceived by editors to constitute false or misleading information is removed. Two years after the project was started, in 2003, anstudy found that “vandalism is usually repaired extremely quicklyso quickly that most users will never see its effects”.The inclusion of false or fabricated content has, at times, lasted for years on Wikipedia due to its volunteer editorship.Its editing model facilitates multiple systemic biases: namely,,,, and. The majority of the encyclopedia is written by male editors, leading to aand the make up of the editing community has prompted concerns about,, corporate bias, and national bias, among others.Anhas been also identified on both conscious and subconscious levels. A series of studies fromin 2012 and 2014 found Wikipedia “significantly more biased” thanbut attributed the finding more to the length of the online encyclopedia as opposed to slanted editing.
The prevalence of non-neutral or conflict-of-interest editing and the use of Wikipedia for “revenge editing” has attracted publicity for inserting false, biased, or defamatory content into articles, especially biographies of living people.Articles on less technical subjects, such as the social sciences, humanities, and culture, have been known to deal with,,, and editor disputes. The online encyclopediato be a reliable source and discourages readers from using it in academic or research settings. Researchers, teachers, journalists, and public officialsWikipedia as a reliable source.It is seen as a valuable “” for researchers when they pass over content to examine the listed references, citations, and sources. Academics suggest reviewing reliable sources when assessing the quality of articles.